WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Washington Post, along with other news sources, is reporting that the Obama Administration has far higher aims for gun control than merely reinstating the ban that expired on assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition during the George W. Bush’s last term.
Vice President Biden now leads a working group that is considering expansive measures that would include tracking the movement and sale of weapons by means of a national database, universal background checks, more thorough mental health checks, and harsher penalties for carrying guns near schools.
Biden opened proceedings on Thursday by joining top administration officials in a meeting with leaders from a number of law enforcement agencies. Speaking to the press, the Vice President said, “The president is absolutely committed to keeping his promise that we will act. We have to have a comprehensive way in which to respond to the mass murder of our children that we saw in Connecticut.”
Law enforcement representatives included Thomas Nee, president of the National Association of Police Organizations; Philadelphia Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey, president of Police Executive Research Forum & Major Cities Chiefs Association; and Jim Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police.
To counter the efforts of The National Rifle Association, the White House is working to create a coalition of unlikely partners. Among those potential supporters of the President’s vision for gun control is New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg (I). Bloomberg is a long-time vocal advocate for gun-control.
A less obvious partner, some insiders say, may be Wal-Mart, hardly a darling of the left. For Wal-Mart the reasons would be less altruistic and more economic. Wal-Mart and other gun retailers have an incentive to support closing a loophole that allows people to bypass background checks if they purchase firearms at gun shows. Gun shows, which are booming across the land, cut deeply in the wholesale giant’s gun sales.
One strategy to increase gun control restrictions was already in play before the Dec. 14 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School. This process would involve looking for measures that do not require congressional approval and can be implemented by executive order. Possibilities include changes to federal mental-health programs and modernization of gun-tracking efforts by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
“Simply coming up with one or two aspects of it really falls short of the magnitude of the gun issue in the country,” said Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum.
Wexler was among a dozen law enforcement leaders who met with Biden and other administration leaders at the Dec. 20 summit that included Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., Education Secretary Arne Duncan, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.
The expired federal assault-weapons law banned the manufacturing of 19 models of semiautomatic guns classified as assault weapons, including certain rifles and shot guns. The law also banned ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds. But it did not ban the sale of previously manufactured assault weapons or high-capacity magazines.
Since the law’s end, efforts in Congress over the past decade to reinstate the ban have faced resolute opposition from the NRA and the firearms industry and have failed to pass.
“As we get involved in these ad nauseam debates over the Second Amendment, our children are still at risk,” said Jon Adler, national president of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association. “Debating is not the action verb we need to protect our children.”
But questions remain as to whether the Whitehouse and lawmakers are looking to simply reinstate the previous ban or push for something more. A number of sources are now reporting that Adam Lanza did not use an assault weapon at Sandy Hook but rather only carried hand guns into the school. Is there something more at work than outlawing sinister looking weapons that were even used at Sandy Hook? Only time will tell.
Off The Grid News Better Ideas For Off The Grid Living

No one ever tries to ban cars when a child is killed by a hit and run driver. Parents are feeding their children psychotropic drugs and the results are evident. Knee jerk reactions to these types of incidents results in laws that cause more harm than good. One thing’s for sure, the Democrats have been terrific for at least ONE industry in this country.
Appears some one did not like my quoting from the movie Shane. First time for every thing. So long. SP
I come from the old school,when your wrong your wrong. Sorry for the mis-information. Put on my glasses an lo and behold theirs “Shane”. Sorry about that OTG. Thanks. SP
the second ammendment was ment for american citizens to be able to take on a taranical govt.like the one we have now,,,with the same small arms the current military use in the civilian market place,,,,,,,,you can see why oslima is trying to disarm america,,,,its got nothing to do with hunting,,,,and a gun can only be taken down by another gun,,or wait for police and die during the wait,,,we are heading to civil war on many fronts
zrz: Appear your are spot on. Being prepared is the only good offense we have left. What ever is over the ……., we can not count on the politicians to give a tinkers D** about your,your family or I. In my wildest dreams I never thought there were Americans who would allow their constitutional right’s be taken by a bunch of Yahoo’s in Washington. Go an read a history book, an see what happened in the communist block countries, an how they allowed the people who were murdered for the greater good. They started at the top, an worked their way down to the peasant’s,by then there was no one to call for help. Be prepared America for tomorrow. God Bless America. SP
Ahhh SP, you are wise beyond your years, me thinks. Weaponry has tradionally been a good investment and a very usable one. Much as I hate to say it, we might be being lead by folks who don’t have our best interest at heart. I’m blue-collar and not uber-educated, it’s hard to make a call on some of this stuff. I believe I’ll go with being armed and ready……
I’m with you on this.I am college educated but not genious by any means. I’ve worked hands on all my life and now retired. This Vietnam vet that will stand with you when the time comes…
If anyone cares to see this video , go to this web-site and see what happens to people when they give up their weapons… http://www.youtube.com/embed/GhJnpK03beU?rel=0
The second amendment is the line in the sand for this person
Yes, protect our children. What was done when Sandy Hook reopened? Large law enforcement presence all armed. IDs were checked on all who emtereed the school. An interesting issue since so many want to disarm the American people. It is guns that ultimately protect us from …
tyr·an·ny [tir-uh-nee]
noun, plural tyr·an·nies.
1.arbitrary or unrestrained exercise of power; despotic abuse of authority.
2.the government or rule of a tyrant or absolute ruler.
3.a state ruled by a tyrant or absolute ruler.
4.oppressive or unjustly severe government on the part of any ruler.
5.undue severity or harshness.
You don’t have to look any farther then our border , to see that our own government, can not or will not defend this country, or it’s citizens. Many who live along the border, feel that they are on their own. It appears that you can’t count on politicians any more to defend our Constitution, or our border’s. I thought they were elected to protect an defend …… If the government will not stand up an defend America, it will fall to the militia to defend an protect America when the SHTF. It may already being hitting the fan??!!. If fundamental change means the destruction of our Constitution, an the Bill of Rights, then this Patriot will not comply. Be prepare, the storm clouds,(chem trails) are already here. God Bless America. Southern Patriot