Privacy   |    Financial   |    Current Events   |    Self Defense   |    Miscellaneous   |    Letters To Editor   |    About Off The Grid News   |    Off The Grid Videos   |    Weekly Radio Show

IRS Seizes $35,000 From Law-Abiding Businessman Simply Because He Made Cash Deposits

Terry Dehko

Image source: Detroit Free-Press

The owner of a small grocery store in Michigan had all of the cash in his bank account seized by the IRS – simply because he had made frequent cash deposits of less than $10,000 at a local bank.

“I’ve always paid my taxes and have never been arrested or charged with any crime in my life,” Terry Dehko wrote in a Washington Times editorial. “But in January of this year, I woke up to find that my business’s entire bank account – more than $35,000— had been wrongly seized.”

Dehko, an immigrant from Iraq, owns Schott’s Market, a small grocery store in Fraser, Michigan. He didn’t realize he allegedly had done anything wrong until an IRS agent walked into his family business and told him that her agency was seizing all of his cash.

Dehko was given no chance to appeal or contest the forfeiture, and the money was simply taken from his account by the IRS using a civil forfeiture law. The grocer didn’t even have a chance to explain his situation.

When he asked the agent how he was supposed to pay his bills, the IRS agent reportedly told Dehko, “I don’t care.”

American Nightmare

“The IRS has turned my American Dream into a nightmare,” Dehko wrote. Dehko has run Schott’s Market for 35 years but he never had any trouble paying his bills until the IRS took his money. “I have never had to pay a vendor late – until that week in January.”

Revisit the counsel of great men and learn how to reclaim the quality of government we once enjoyed.

Terry Dehko believes that the IRS targeted his funds for forfeiture because his employees were making frequent deposits of less than $10,000 at the bank across the street from his market. Making such deposits is not illegal unless it is done to hide cash from the IRS, and Dehko said he wasn’t trying to hide cash.

He noted that he had been making the deposits because his insurance policy doesn’t let him keep more than $10,000 in cash in his store. By following the rules, Dehko became a target for forfeiture.

The grocer who fled Saddam Hussein’s Iraq for the United States is not accepting his treatment. Dehko and his daughter have appealed the IRS’s action with the help of the Institute for Justice, a national civil rights organization. Their appeal in United States v. $35,651.11 was filed Sept. 25.

Lack of Due Process

The Institute’s description of civil forfeiture laws is frightening and disturbing. It describes a vicious system in which the federal government can literally seize any citizen’s money without first talking to the individual. Here’s how an Institute press release describes forfeiture:

“Federal civil forfeiture law features an appalling lack of due process. It empowers the government to seize private property from Americans without ever, charging let alone convicting them, of a crime. Perversely the government then pockets the proceeds while providing no prompt a to get a court to review the seizure.”

The first court date will be Dec. 4.

“We’re pleased that Terry and Sandy will finally get their day in court to challenge the seizure of their store’s entire bank account,” said Clark Neily, an attorney with the Institite for Justice. “But the fact that it took nearly a year for them to get that hearing highlights the due process problems with civil forfeiture law. No American should have to wait so long without an opportunity to challenge the seizure of their property.”

Dehko’s loss of money should be a wakeup call for all small businesspeople and self-employed people. If you operate any sort of business and you make frequent small cash deposits, you could be a target for such forfeiture by the IRS.

It sounds as if the IRS has decided to label any individual that makes frequent cash deposits a tax evader and target them for forfeiture.

This case is particularly disturbing because it indicates a pattern of punishing those who follow the rules. Had Dehko simply pocketed the cash and evaded taxes he wouldn’t have faced forfeiture. Instead, the grocer was targeted because he and his daughter, Sandy (his partner in the grocery store), tried to comply with their insurance policy and the law.

Hopefully, the courts will rule in Dehko’s favor and ban such forfeiture efforts. If the courts don’t act, perhaps Congress should pass a law banning civil forfeiture once and for all. This practice is a threat to the livelihood of all Americans.

© 2008-2014 Off The Grid News

10 comments

  1. So I would like to hear how such a small business can get around this, or use creative loopholes to avoid this happening, while obeying the law.

    Like how would corporate America get around this, they have a million loopholes they bypass to not pay any taxes while making millions and billions of dollars, even so much that corporations like Facebook etc get a huge tax return!!!?

  2. I’m at a loss. Since a small grocery store likely has tons of customers that pay in cash, what are they supposed to do with that cash? I hope that Americans are waking up and will demand the government that works for us to strike down these dirty and backhanded laws.

  3. It is a big scam the same as using RICO laws for local law enforcement to seize cash and cars to sell to further bloat their departments for those they “suspect” of being drug criminals. No surpirse that ObamaCare mocks John Adams twice, while taking away due process.

  4. This is terrible for certain small businesses. My wife and I run a mobile restaurant (similar to a food truck) and 95% of our sales are cash based. We make many small cash deposits as we do not want to be a target for being robbed. We not only have to report our sales to the IRS, but the state retail sales tax office as well. We would likely ruined if the IRS suddenly seized our account. This type of practice must be stopped.

  5. bitcoins would be perfect thing here! people need to learn how to use them and more businesses need to accept it!
    We need to take the power out of the hands of the govt. Give it back to the people!

  6. ::Shaking head:: With all that is going wrong in this country one might think that the Gov’t is daring its citizens to protest so that they can implement their true agenda…

  7. That’s why I don’t save in the bank anymore. I feel for him and hope he wins.

  8. Let’s not forget that the “friendly” bank across the street was the one who turned him in to the IRS. Never, ever trust a bank, insurance company or any government employee. They are not your friend.

  9. It’s a direct violation of the Fourth Amendment.

    All Americans should take all their money OUT of the banks.

    The bill Chris Dodd and Barney Frank pushed through Congress just prior to their retirements stipulates that in the event of economic collapse or other national financial emergency, the banks can confiscate your deposit and it’s considered a “loan” until such time as they can pay it back or file bankruptcy and get out of the obligation all together.

    YES, noose therapy is in order.

  10. This is yet another problem caused by the prohibition of drugs & the drug war. Everyone is now labeled a criminal, even these poor people – its now closer to guilty until proven innocent. It also shows how the government can & will steal your money, and storing money in banks only helps them do so. The government on all levels loses control as society moves more to a cash society. What we gain in security we lose is convenience.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>