• Home
  • About Off The Grid
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
Monday, June 23, 2025
  • How-To
  • Grid Threats
  • Survival
  • Gardening
  • Food
  • Worldview
  • Health
  • Privacy
  • Hunting
  • Defense
  • Financial
  • News
  • Misc
No Result
View All Result
  • How-To
  • Grid Threats
  • Survival
  • Gardening
  • Food
  • Worldview
  • Health
  • Privacy
  • Hunting
  • Defense
  • Financial
  • News
  • Misc
No Result
View All Result
Off The Grid News
Home Privacy

Court Rules Police Must Get Warrant For GPS Tracking

by Off The Grid News Staff
in Privacy
Print Print
GPS tracking police

Image source: https://newautogps.com/

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on TruthEmail Article
GPS tracking police
Image source: https://newautogps.com/

Law enforcement agencies will have to get warrants if they want to track vehicles using GPS under a landmark federal court ruling.

In the first explicit ruling of its kind, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the FBI violated three suspects’ rights by putting a tracker on their car without a warrant.

The 2-1 decision in United States vs. Katzin answered a question raised by a 2012 U. Supreme Court case, United States vs. Jones. In the earlier case the Supreme Court ruled that tracking of movements can be construed as a search under the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Court, though, did not decide if a warrant is needed to use GPS devices – which the Third Circuit now says is required.

“(The) opinion offers a full-throated defense of the Fourth Amendment, and installs an important safeguard against unjustified government surveillance,” said Nathan Freed Wessler of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Limits the use of tracking devices

The Third Circuit case dealt with a gang of armed robbers dubbed the Katzin brothers. The FBI had attached a GPS tracking device to one of the brother’s vans in an attempt to monitor their movements.

Learn how the law of God limits or reverses the “natural progress” of man’s law toward authoritarianism

The Third Circuit Court found that agents had violated the Fourth Amendment by attaching the device to the brothers’ car without a warrant. The ruling clearly bars the use of tracking devices attached to vehicle without warrants.

The decision is definitely a victory for privacy groups because it limits the use of tracking devices attached to vehicles.

“Where an officer decides to take the Fourth Amendment inquiry into his own hands, rather than to seek a warrant from a neutral magistrate — particularly where the law is as far from settled as it was in this case — he acts in a constitutionally reckless fashion,” the majority opinion read. “Here, law enforcement personnel made a deliberate decision to forego securing a warrant before attaching a GPS device directly to a target vehicle in the absence of binding Fourth Amendment precedent authorizing such a practice. . . . Excluding the evidence here will incentivize the police to err on the side of constitutional behavior and help prevent future Fourth Amendment violations.”

Some forms of warrantless tracking may still be legal

But some other kinds of tracking are not addressed by the Third Circuit, although the ACLU’s Wessler believes the ruling applies.

“As courts around the country consider challenges to warrantless location tracking by police (whether using GPS devices or cell phone signals), they would do well to follow the Third Circuit’s lead,” he said.

The issue of tracking is a complex one, and this ruling only deals with one kind of tracking. Another problem is that the case only covers a small area of the United States. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals only has jurisdiction over New Jersey, Delaware and Pennsylvania.

Other Circuit Courts have ruled that police didn’t need to get warrants for GPS tracking. The Supreme Court has not ruled on whether warrants are required for such tracking, although it did rule that tracking is a search as defined by Fourth Amendment. The Third Circuit Court’s ruling would only apply to the entire country if it is upheld by the Supreme Court.

Still, the victory is an important one for the Fourth Amendment, civil liberties groups say. In a brief submitted to the court in Katzin the ACLU’s attorneys noted:

“Where an officer decides to take the Fourth Amendment inquiry into his own hands, rather than to seek a warrant from neutral magistrate, he acts in a constitutionally reckless fashion.”

Judge Joseph A. Greenaway, who wrote the majority opinion, was nominated by President Clinton. Joining him in the opinion was Judge D. Brooks Smith, a nominee of President George W. Smith. Judge Franklin Stuart Van Antwerpen, who dissented, also was nominated by Bush.

ShareTweetShareSend

Related Posts

Neuralink’s Dangerous New Trademark Filings

Neuralink’s Dangerous New Trademark Filings

by Bill Heid

The Dark Side of Neural Implants… Power… Privacy… and Control? From an observer’s standpoint, Neuralink’s newly filed trademarks signal an...

When Powerful Machines Are Watching: Privacy Threats and Your Best Defenses in an Automated World

When Powerful Machines Are Watching: Privacy Threats and Your Best Defenses in an Automated World

by Bill Heid

Between Innovation and Intrusion: Safeguarding Privacy in the Age of AI Artificial intelligence is evolving at a breathtaking pace, revolutionizing...

Unraveling the Chemical Complexity of Pine Needles

Safeguarding Your Children’s Privacy in a “Connected” Christmas

by Bill Heid

Are your child’s experiences being sent to massive data centers? Increasingly, these special surprises include advanced technology… toys that respond...

Next Post
Best Secret Toilet Paper Storage Large Quantity & Hidden In Plain View – Great Long Term Storage

Homemade Graham Crackers

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Abraham Patiently Prepares For Christmas

Abraham Patiently Prepares For Christmas

11 Ways To Stay Sane When It’s 20 Below

11 Ways To Stay Sane When It’s 20 Below

Prepping For An Evacuation: How To Be Ready When The Gov't Says ‘Get Out’

Prepping For An Evacuation: How To Be Ready When The Gov’t Says ‘Get Out’

TRENDING STORIES

  • bubonic plague

    Is Another Bubonic Plague Pandemic On The Horizon?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Waco Fertilizer Plant Explosion & A Look Back On The “Waco Massacre”

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Make Yourself 3 Times More Likely To Survive A Heart Attack

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • AI Surveillance Of Shoppers: Walmart’s Newest Tool To Grab Your Data

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • ‘Apocalyptic’ Microchip Implants Are Here – And Being Inserted Into People’s Hands

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Subscribe to our Insider Newsletter

Huge discounts on off-the-grid gear and life saving supplements.






‘Off The Grid News’ is an independent, weekly email newsletter and website that is crammed full of practical information on living and surviving off the grid. Advice you’ll never hear from the mainstream media.

  • How-To
  • Grid Threats
  • Extreme Survival
  • Survival Gardening
  • Off-Grid Foods
  • Worldview
  • Natural Health
  • Survival Hunting
  • Privacy
  • Financial
  • Current Events
  • Self Defense
  • Home Defense
  • Pain-Free Living
  • Miscellaneous
  • Off Grid Videos

© Copyright 2025 Off The Grid News.  All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy   Terms & Conditions
No Result
View All Result
  • How-To
  • Grid Threats
  • Survival
  • Gardening
  • Food
  • Worldview
  • Health
  • Privacy
  • Hunting
  • Defense
  • Financial
  • News
  • Misc
  • Videos

© Copyright 2025 Off The Grid News.  All Rights Reserved.