• Home
  • About Off The Grid
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
Friday, June 13, 2025
  • How-To
  • Grid Threats
  • Survival
  • Gardening
  • Food
  • Worldview
  • Health
  • Privacy
  • Hunting
  • Defense
  • Financial
  • News
  • Misc
No Result
View All Result
  • How-To
  • Grid Threats
  • Survival
  • Gardening
  • Food
  • Worldview
  • Health
  • Privacy
  • Hunting
  • Defense
  • Financial
  • News
  • Misc
No Result
View All Result
Off The Grid News
Home Current Events

Uncle Sam Fined This Farmer $680,000 For Selling HIS OWN Raisins — And The Supreme Court Just Issued A Major Ruling

by Off The Grid News Staff
in Current Events
Print Print
Uncle Sam Fined This Farmer $680,000 For Selling HIS OWN Raisins — And The Supreme Court Just Issued A Major Ruling
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on TruthEmail Article

horne -- raisin farmThe federal government can no longer tell family farmers how many raisins to grow and sell, the US Supreme Court ruled Monday in a case in which one farmer was fined $680,000 simply because he refused to obey the government’s orders.

The decision was a defeat for the Obama administration, which had argued that taking upwards of one-half of a farmer’s crop was nothing more than “market regulation.”

The government must compensate him, the court ruled in a 5-4 decision.

“The Government has a categorical duty to pay just compensation when it takes your car, just as when it takes your home,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the court’s opinion in a case called Horne vs. Department of Agriculture.

Raisins, he wrote, are “the fruit of the growers’ labor,” and not “public things subject to the absolute control of the state,”

California raisin farmer Marvin D. Horne had argued that the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) violated the takings clause in the Fifth Amendment by fining him for not turning over part of his crop to a federal agency, the Raisin Administrative Committee, which determines each year what percentage of raisins farmers can’t sell.

Learn How To Become Invisible In Today’s Surveillance State!

The USDA fined Horne and his wife Laura $680,000 for refusing to turn 47 percent of their crop over to the committee during the 2002-2003 growing season, Off the Grid News reported earlier this year. The Hornes were required to turn the raisins over to the committee by an old law, the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1937.

The act required raisin farmers to turn a percentage of their crop over to the government without charge, as part of a program meant to stabilize raisin market prices. The law passed during President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal and limited the supply on the market.

As Roberts noted, “The required allocation is determined by the Raisin Administrative Committee, a Government entity composed largely of growers and others in the raisin business appointed by the Secretary of Agriculture.”

In 2003–2004, farmers were ordered to turn over 30 percent of their crop.

Instead of turning their raisins over to the committee, the Hornes sold them on the open market. That led the government to try and take their money instead of their crop.

The government fined the Hornes “a fine equal to the market value of the missing raisins—some $480,000—as well as an additional civil penalty of just over $200,000 for disobeying the order to turn them over,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted.

Sotomayor dissented, agreeing with Obama administration lawyers who argued that the USDA’s actions did not violate the takings clause in the Fifth Amendment. The last portion of the amendment states: “Nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

Sotomayor claimed that the USDA’s actions were not a taking because Horne benefited from the higher prices for raisins the program created. Sotomayor was the only justice who refused to call the USDA’s action a form of taking.

Most raisin farmers participated in the program and supported it. The extra raisins were sold overseas or used in school lunch programs.

Five Supreme Court Justices – John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito — ruled in Horne’s favor. Four justices – Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan — agreed with part of the decision but dissented to the rest. Only Sotomayor agreed fully with the administration’s contention.

Who was right — the farmer or the government? Should the government set up programs to regulate prices? Share your thoughts in the section below:

You’re Being Watched: 7 Sneaky Ways The Government Is Tracking Your Every Move. Read More Here.

ShareTweetShareSend

Related Posts

Tulsi Gabbard’s Latest ‘Nuclear Winter’ Alarm and the Gathering Storm

Tulsi Gabbard’s Latest ‘Nuclear Winter’ Alarm and the Gathering Storm

by Bill Heid

Brace for the Massive Event? I have to admit that this whole thing seems a bit odd. Is this a...

Rage for Rent: In The Great Los Angeles Riot Market

Rage for Rent: In The Great Los Angeles Riot Market

by Bill Heid

Blood Money on Craigslist? I saw the ad sometime after midnight—half-asleep, half-mad. On a tip from X, I began scrolling...

Is The Housing Market On The Verge Of Panic?

Is The Housing Market On The Verge Of Panic?

by Bill Heid

A Surplus of Sellers, a Shortage of Buyers The U.S. housing market is showing signs of imbalance, and not in...

Next Post
10 Terrifying Realities Of Long-Term Blackouts (That Americans Never Consider)

10 Terrifying Realities Of Long-Term Blackouts (That Americans Never Consider)

Please login to join discussion

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

epa septic tank

Septic Tanks Now Regulated And Monitored By EPA

These 2 Men Face Jail Time For Selling Beer (Yes, Beer)

These 2 Men Face 12 Months In Jail For Selling Beer (Yes, Beer)

Udderly EZ Milker

Udderly EZ Milker

TRENDING STORIES

  • bubonic plague

    Is Another Bubonic Plague Pandemic On The Horizon?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Waco Fertilizer Plant Explosion & A Look Back On The “Waco Massacre”

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Make Yourself 3 Times More Likely To Survive A Heart Attack

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • AI Surveillance Of Shoppers: Walmart’s Newest Tool To Grab Your Data

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • ‘Apocalyptic’ Microchip Implants Are Here – And Being Inserted Into People’s Hands

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Subscribe to our Insider Newsletter

Huge discounts on off-the-grid gear and life saving supplements.






‘Off The Grid News’ is an independent, weekly email newsletter and website that is crammed full of practical information on living and surviving off the grid. Advice you’ll never hear from the mainstream media.

  • How-To
  • Grid Threats
  • Extreme Survival
  • Survival Gardening
  • Off-Grid Foods
  • Worldview
  • Natural Health
  • Survival Hunting
  • Privacy
  • Financial
  • Current Events
  • Self Defense
  • Home Defense
  • Pain-Free Living
  • Miscellaneous
  • Off Grid Videos

© Copyright 2025 Off The Grid News.  All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy   Terms & Conditions
No Result
View All Result
  • How-To
  • Grid Threats
  • Survival
  • Gardening
  • Food
  • Worldview
  • Health
  • Privacy
  • Hunting
  • Defense
  • Financial
  • News
  • Misc
  • Videos

© Copyright 2025 Off The Grid News.  All Rights Reserved.